It’s amazing how much comment spam is directed at my site, although I’m sure the amount of spam directed at my site is modest compared to others.
I don’t know why the spammers keep it up, since I don’t even notice it until I check the site stats and find out where all the hits originate. So, unless there’s another reason for them to attempt to spam my site, apart from taking up bandwidth, I don’t see why they would want to continue.
I’m not sure if there is a law against this, if not, there should be, just as there has recently been a law passed outlawing email spam (not that it made much difference) to my spam folder.
I suppose in the end it’s the people who aren’t tech savvy that will cop the flood of unsolicited ads directed at no one in particular.
In other words, spammers are the equivalent of the trawl line fishing - everyone gets spammed, young and old alike. No one is spared from ads for online casinos, wrist watches, various assortments of pills, all kinds of get-rich-quick offers etc…
But, going by the logic of the spammers, there’s one born every minute, so someone out there is bound to respond. Which must be true, otherwise the spam would have dried up ages ago. (With comment spam it’s to improve the rankings in the search engines.)
Anyway, apart from all the moral issues, I wonder how much network traffic is used up by spam? I mean for every legitimate person that visits my site, I’m pretty sure one or more spam bot(s) have hit my site hundreds of times. Because of this unwanted traffic, hosts would have to upgrade their systems to account for the extra network load.
At the end of the day someone’s got to foot the bill.